Ethical Behavior and Ethical Lenses Of Baird Essay

Ethical Behavior and Ethical Lenses Of Baird - Essay ExampleThe ELI is sure to facilitate the self-discovery of ones underlying nurtures which help individuals to identify their preferred approach to solving good dilemmas. Ones personal code of ethics is shaped by ones family members, teachers, norms and regulations of the community, conventional and informal education, philosophy, morality and religion. Similarly, each profession and organization has its own honorable codes (values, expectations and set of preferences) which the employees have to follow. It is too important for individuals to identify the values in run afoul through greater self-knowledge. These values in conflict are the result of differences between ones personal and community values, conflicts as to which personal value should take priority in a given situation, and the disparity between ones silk hat and worst selves. The ELI will also equip one to identify ones values in conflict and as such this paper s eeks to address my personal ethics statement based on Bairds estimable decision model. For Baird, the four basic values that form ones respectable behavior and determine ones primary estimable lens are understanding, sensibility, autonomy and equation. Among these, tenability stresses on reason, principles, critical thinking and analysis sensibility emphasizes empathy and compassion where the individual follows his heart or recognition in ethical decisions autonomy favors personal rights and responsibilities in ethical behavior whereas equality takes into account the inescapably of the community in ethical choices (Baird & Niacaris 11). Analyzing my own ethical values it is evident that rationality stands at the affection of my ethical statement. I strongly believe in the power of reason, principles, critical thinking and analysis in making ethical choices. However, regarding the priority of values to be undertaken in various situations I stand split up between autonomy and equality. Even though I am a strong advocate of equality and value the motivatings of the community I favor my personal rights and responsibilities as well in legion(predicate) instances. Therefore, I realize that there are certain conflicts of values with regard to my ethical decisions which I need to sort out carefully. It is also worthwhile to analyze the four ethical lenses of Baird to have a radical understanding regarding my own ethical perspectives. For Baird, ones value preferences determine ones ethical lens and therefore it is significant to identify my own core values and the corresponding ethical lens. Baird categorizes the ethical lenses into four rights and responsibility lens, results lens, relationship lens, and reputation lens. The Rights and Responsibility Lens emphasizes the core values of autonomy and rationality and it holds that the individual is capable of making his own ethical choices through critical thinking and analysis. On the early(a) hand, the Resu lts Lens emphasizes the core values of autonomy and sensibility and the focus of the individual is on the results or consequences of his actions. As such the ethical perspective has its roots in the teleological tradition which stresses on utilitarianism. The third ethical perspective is the Relationship Lens that emphasizes the core values of equality and rationality, traditionally known as theories of umpire and it has its roots in the deontological tradition. This ethical perspective exhorts one to treat everyone in the community with respect and dignity. On the other hand, the Reputation Lens emphasizes the values of equality and sensibility and the lens focuses on what virtues the community believes should be cultivated by those in positions of responsibility. With regard to my e